🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.